Legalization Of Gay Marriage.

Olarbatak your blogger here,do understand I only write on occasions so don’t be offended by my absence.


The image above illustrates the first human beings brought into this world,I ask myself if we could blame the same people for leading us into a life of sin.I could debate on that but religious reasons should be left aside.It is a sin but not everyone believes in God ,Allah or whoever you worship.I will try explain why this legalization is absurd.

I could start by saying that that the legalization was based on politics and corruption,United States are in debt.My research says by the end of 2016 they will be in debt of 16 trillion in total!How does Gay marriage come in?population growth.They can’t feed there people leave alone provide jobs yet they are placed as a first class country?As you will see in the years to come the population of the U.S.A will have a great decrease.You still think it’s right?

Same-sex marriage is not marriage. Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and well being of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.

Such people can’t have a child of their own leading to adoption ,this might be a good thing to some but It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It naturally tends to create families.

On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families.
Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.

It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union

Those who are anti-gay marriage could be accused of a hate crime,you don’t see people who are “anti-straight” being accused of hate crime.

There is no evidence of majority support for this measure, even in the gay community. In an article in the Daily Mail, the well known columnist Andrew Pierce writes that he is a gay man who opposes gay marriage. Alan Duncan, the International Development Minister, who is in a civil partnership, is implacably opposed to gay marriage. David Starkey, the openly gay historian, is also opposed to the concept of gay marriage. The Labour MP Ben Bradshaw, who was the first Cabinet Minister to enter into a civil partnership, has openly criticised the idea of gay marriage, saying that the move to smash centuries of church teaching is “pure politics” and not wanted by the gay community, which has already won equality through civil partnerships.

Not even gay people support gay marriage.

I can go on and on but i will leave you to this,if our future kids grow up with the mind of “love is love” they would start looking at there siblings differently.This is where it’s leading us to.If 85% of our population become gay we are talking about possible extinction.Yes,we shouldn’t judge others based on there sexuality but rather based on the downfall of this world.

Quote of the day:One man,one woman,two children,a population” ‘unknown’


One comment

  1. Rita · July 7, 2015

    I was gay and yes not even gay people approve of this,Thanks for reminding me.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s